Kenya’s recent decision to revise visitor entry authorisation fees has sparked concerns among tourism stakeholders in the East African region. The introduction of new electronic travel authorisation (eTA) fees has raised questions about the potential impact on tourism numbers and the overall travel experience for visitors.
The eTA system, which was first launched in January, was aimed at boosting tourism numbers in Kenya following the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the new fees have raised concerns about the potential barriers they may create for free movement within the region.
Previously, visitors to Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda could travel under an EAC tourism visa arrangement that cost $100 and allowed for a 90-day stay. While the EAC tourism visa was designed to increase visitor numbers in the region, some countries, such as Tanzania, had been hesitant to join, citing preferential treatment towards Kenya.
Despite the existence of the EAC tourism visa, Rwanda has since waived most visa requirements, allowing for easier access for travelers with valid documents. Kenya’s eTA system was introduced not only for security purposes but also to facilitate the opening of borders for increased tourism numbers.
However, the high visa fees in Kenya are likely to deter potential visitors, especially when compared to the relatively lower visa charges in neighboring countries. Rwanda, for example, offers more favorable travel arrangements and visa exemptions, making it a more attractive destination for tourists.
In response to the new eTA fees, tourism stakeholders have expressed concerns about the potential impact on tourist numbers. The government has stated that it will monitor the situation and assess the impact of the fees on the sector. However, there is no indication of whether the fees will be revised based on this assessment.
In addition to the eTA fees, Kenya will also require the declaration of International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) numbers for mobile devices starting in 2025. This requirement has raised privacy concerns among travelers and has been criticized as a form of surveillance rather than a tax measure.
Overall, the new charges and requirements in Kenya have raised concerns among tourism stakeholders, who fear that the country may become less attractive to visitors. It remains to be seen how these changes will impact tourism numbers and whether adjustments will be made to address the concerns raised by industry players.
