The prevalence of disability among individuals over the age of fifty is on the rise, yet many people lack access to essential mobility aids that can help maintain their independence and social engagement. A recent study published in The Lancet Public Health examined the factors that influence the use of mobility aids among individuals who would benefit from them.
The study analyzed data from 12,080 participants aged 50–89 over a thirteen-year period, using information from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging. Of the participants who reported having mobility difficulties, 61% experienced unmet need (not using a mobility aid despite needing one), while 39% reported using a mobility aid at least once.
Interestingly, the study found that women were 50% more likely than men to transition from not needing a mobility aid to unmet need status. However, they were 20% less likely to transition from unmet need to actual use. This gender disparity highlights a concerning inequality in access to mobility aids that needs to be addressed in public health initiatives.
The researchers also identified other demographic factors associated with a higher likelihood of needing a mobility aid, including lower educational attainment, unemployment or disability, and lower wealth. However, these demographics were also more likely to use mobility aids if they needed one, underscoring the significance of gender as a key determinant of unmet need.
Cost was identified as the biggest barrier to mobility aid use for both genders, according to previous research from the UCL Global Disability Innovation Hub. Professor Cathy Holloway emphasized the impact of not having access to mobility aids on independence and quality of life, particularly for women who are not receiving the support they need.
Further research is needed to understand the complex reasons behind why women are less likely than men to use mobility aids when they need them. Professor Shereen Hussein stressed the importance of addressing gender disparities in access to assistive technology and called for inclusive, gender-sensitive approaches in the design and production of mobility aids.
This study sheds light on the critical need to prioritize gender equity in aging and disability policy developments, ensuring that all individuals have equal access to the mobility aids that can significantly improve their quality of life. By addressing the barriers preventing women from accessing mobility aids, we can work towards a more inclusive and supportive society for individuals with disabilities.
