The African Transformation Movement (ATM) recently made headlines with the unexpected removal of its long-standing president, Vuyolwethu Zungula. The decision was met with surprise and speculation as party insiders revealed the internal power dynamics that led to Zungula’s ousting.
According to sources within the ATM, Zungula’s growing popularity and prominence within the party had sparked concerns among some members. A faction within the party reportedly opposed his leadership and feared that he was becoming too dominant, leading to his sudden removal as president.
The decision to replace Zungula with the party’s founder, Caesar Nongqunga, was seen by many as a strategic move to expand the ATM’s support base ahead of the upcoming 2026 and 2029 elections. However, sources close to the matter described the decision as “bizarre” and illogical, highlighting the lack of communication and transparency in the process.
Zungula, who was not informed about the decision to remove him, has refrained from publicly commenting on the matter. Sources revealed that there is a faction within the party waiting for him to make a mistake in order to potentially remove him from parliament. As a result, Zungula has chosen to remain silent and “lay low” until the situation settles.
The ATM’s national executive committee (NEC) reportedly reached an agreement to remove Zungula as president, despite his absence from the meeting where the decision was made. The party’s spokesperson, Zama Ntshona, stated that the decision was based on discussions following the 2024 elections and was aimed at separating the roles of parliamentary advocacy and party growth.
Despite allegations of undermining Zungula’s contributions to the party, Ntshona dismissed the claims as malicious and unfounded. He assured that Zungula would continue to lead the party in parliament and remain its chief spokesperson, with Nongqunga focusing on party growth and alliances.
Rumors of former president Jacob Zuma advising the ATM to remove Zungula were also dismissed by Ntshona, who emphasized the independence of both parties. The ATM’s collaboration with the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party in upcoming elections has raised concerns among members, who fear being overshadowed by the larger party.
Overall, the sudden leadership change in the ATM has raised questions about internal party dynamics and the future direction of the organization. As Zungula navigates this challenging period, the party faces the task of maintaining unity and focus amidst internal tensions and external pressures. The decision to separate the roles in party leadership and parliamentary leadership has been made with the aim of promoting the growth of the party. This move signifies our commitment to independence and strategic planning for the future.
By delineating the responsibilities of party leadership and parliamentary leadership, we are streamlining our operations and ensuring that each aspect of our organization is functioning at its best. This separation allows for a clear division of duties, enabling us to focus on specific goals and objectives within each realm.
The independence of this decision is crucial, as it demonstrates our dedication to the democratic process and the autonomy of our party. We are not swayed by external influences or pressures, but rather are driven by our own internal deliberations and considerations.
Furthermore, this move is intended to foster growth within the party. By establishing distinct leadership roles, we are creating opportunities for new voices and perspectives to emerge. This diversity of leadership will ultimately strengthen our party and enhance our ability to connect with a broader range of constituents.
In conclusion, the decision to separate party leadership and parliamentary leadership is a strategic one that reflects our commitment to independence and growth. This move will position us for success in the future and ensure that we are able to effectively navigate the complexities of modern politics.
